Summary of SEO 101 Episode 383
Ross and John cover Core Web Vitals as a ranking signal, more news on Google’s May Core algorithm update, indexing issues, and the impact of COVID-19 on SEO agencies. We follow this info with local SEO news, a Mueller file, and answers to three SEO questions from our listen
NOTE: If you like to receive our show notes straight to your inbox, sign up to our SEO 101 Podcast Show Notes Newsletter available at SEO101Radio.com.
Notes from SEO 101 Episode 383
General SEO News
- They are looking at Loading, Interactivity and Visual Stability in the Core Web Vitals. They will combine Web Vitals with Mobile Friendly, Safe Browsing. HTTPS and Interstitials to complete the “page experience” metric portion of the algos.
- includes a change that removes the requirement for AMP pages in “Top Stories”
- They have also replaced the Beta Page Speed Test in GSC with a Core Web Vitals tool.
- No Rush, does not roll out till next year. Tool is there now.
- If you use Lighthouse, they baked the new metrics into that already as well.
- Go to Google’s https://web.dev/vitals/ for an explanation of the “essential metrics for a healthy site” that are based on the core web vitals.
Pinterest overwhelming results – forums were hit hard
Mostly last night, but we had some issues as early as this morning.
General SEO News
- No list currently exists. This is the best there is https://developers.google.com/maps-booking/policies/criteria
Ticketing services, wellness & fitness services, spa & beauty services
- PHI and HIPAA compliant businesses don’t have access to Reserve with Google
- Link to a list of unsupported services (screenshot)
Questions from SEO 101 Listeners
Ross and John also welcome some SEO-related concerns from listeners. Please listen to the show to find out their detailed answers to these questions.
Yildirimturk Yavuz Huseyin: “Has anyone tried rankmath seo free tool and compared with expensive yoast seo? what do you think?”
Joshua Rowe: “Hello there! I have a question regarding backlinks. I started a new blog and received my first referring domain. The problem is they’ve linked to about half of my posts 70 times in total. Out of curiosity, I visited the referring site and it just pops up a bunch of alerts saying my computer is infected with a virus. The question is do I need to disavow these types of backlinks or will Google and other search engines know to automatically disregard them when scoring my site? Thanks in advance!”
Vinayak Jhunjhunwala: “One of my colleagues wrote a blog which got curated/published by a big online publisher. He did add a canonical link (to the website where this originally was published i.e his own personal website) to the blog on the large site. Even though the canonical link is added, Google is still showing the link on the larger site in the search results and not the canonical link. What can be the reason behind it? Is there a way to solve it?”
End of Show Notes
If you have any questions you would like to share with Ross and John, please feel free to post them on the SEO 101 Facebook Group. And, if you enjoy SEO 101 on WebmasterRadio.FM please consider supporting the hosts with feedback on Apple Podcasts, Stitcher, or your favourite podcast stream.