<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Google Penalties &#8211; Questions and Answers by Ross Dunn</title> <atom:link href="http://www.stepforth.com/blog/2009/google-penalties-questions-answers-ross-dunn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.stepforth.com/blog/2009/google-penalties-questions-answers-ross-dunn/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: paul</title><link>http://www.stepforth.com/blog/2009/google-penalties-questions-answers-ross-dunn/comment-page-1/#comment-25307</link> <dc:creator>paul</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 23:56:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.stepforth.com/?p=1813#comment-25307</guid> <description>well i have struggled for a year to get some rank for this site. and just a month ago i started directing traffic to the site using adwords. Suddenly the site jumped from 10 visitors a day to around 200. I thought my luck had turned. Now after 2 months of heightened activity and the thought that i might actually be able to work with the site, it has dropped back down to 10 visitors a day.
I am hoping that some changes i made on 301 redirects is the problem now and it will just be a few days of reindexing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well i have struggled for a year to get some rank for this site. and just a month ago i started directing traffic to the site using adwords. Suddenly the site jumped from 10 visitors a day to around 200. I thought my luck had turned. Now after 2 months of heightened activity and the thought that i might actually be able to work with the site, it has dropped back down to 10 visitors a day.<br
/> I am hoping that some changes i made on 301 redirects is the problem now and it will just be a few days of reindexing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: China tours</title><link>http://www.stepforth.com/blog/2009/google-penalties-questions-answers-ross-dunn/comment-page-1/#comment-3363</link> <dc:creator>China tours</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 09:06:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.stepforth.com/?p=1813#comment-3363</guid> <description>It is so bad to be punished by google, don&#039;t expect them to get you ranked well that soon.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is so bad to be punished by google, don&#8217;t expect them to get you ranked well that soon.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title><link>http://www.stepforth.com/blog/2009/google-penalties-questions-answers-ross-dunn/comment-page-1/#comment-2200</link> <dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:06:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.stepforth.com/?p=1813#comment-2200</guid> <description>The best approach is to remove everything you could think of that might be associated with your penalty and submit the request. It usually takes some time for Google to respond so you will want to make sure you stop all marketing efforts that might have caused the penalty in the first place.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best approach is to remove everything you could think of that might be associated with your penalty and submit the request. It usually takes some time for Google to respond so you will want to make sure you stop all marketing efforts that might have caused the penalty in the first place.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Web Marketing Search Engine Optimization</title><link>http://www.stepforth.com/blog/2009/google-penalties-questions-answers-ross-dunn/comment-page-1/#comment-1650</link> <dc:creator>Web Marketing Search Engine Optimization</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:43:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.stepforth.com/?p=1813#comment-1650</guid> <description>Thanks for the useful and helpful information about google penalities..and also it clarified my doubts too.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the useful and helpful information about google penalities..and also it clarified my doubts too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paul</title><link>http://www.stepforth.com/blog/2009/google-penalties-questions-answers-ross-dunn/comment-page-1/#comment-1610</link> <dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:56:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.stepforth.com/?p=1813#comment-1610</guid> <description>Big one floating around lately; is the use of OpenDNS or are the perceived changes to the algorithm related to response time going to be significant factors in SEO?  How much can response/load time penalize a site?Nice QA!  Thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big one floating around lately; is the use of OpenDNS or are the perceived changes to the algorithm related to response time going to be significant factors in SEO?  How much can response/load time penalize a site?</p><p>Nice QA!  Thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 1/8 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 424/426 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.stepforth.com

Served from: www.stepforth.com @ 2012-02-11 22:46:00 -->
