<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Redirects: Permanent 301 vs. Temporary 302</title> <atom:link href="http://www.stepforth.com/blog/2008/redirects-permanent-301-vs-temporary-302/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.stepforth.com/blog/2008/redirects-permanent-301-vs-temporary-302/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: 301 vs 302 Redirects in SharePoint &#171; SPMatt</title><link>http://www.stepforth.com/blog/2008/redirects-permanent-301-vs-temporary-302/comment-page-1/#comment-31900</link> <dc:creator>301 vs 302 Redirects in SharePoint &#171; SPMatt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:51:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://dev.stepforth.com/blog/redirects-permanent-301-vs-temporary-302.php#comment-31900</guid> <description>[...] of some existing resources that explain the details better than I could myself. The article Redirects: Permanent 301 vs. Temporary 302 does a good job in doing [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of some existing resources that explain the details better than I could myself. The article Redirects: Permanent 301 vs. Temporary 302 does a good job in doing [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ross Dunn</title><link>http://www.stepforth.com/blog/2008/redirects-permanent-301-vs-temporary-302/comment-page-1/#comment-30372</link> <dc:creator>Ross Dunn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:47:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://dev.stepforth.com/blog/redirects-permanent-301-vs-temporary-302.php#comment-30372</guid> <description>Ack, I think I just had an aneurysm trying to grasp your situation Bex ;-)Joking aside, I am afraid I don&#039;t have the time at the moment to decipher this (due to Christmas deadlines) but I don&#039;t want you to be left without an option. Please email me ross@stepforth.com and I will see what I can do in the next few weeks to get back to you. Either that, or, if you wish a faster answer we could assist you with this and any other questions you may have with some consulting time. Just &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stepforth.com/services/submit-service-request/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;submit a service request here&lt;/a&gt; and we will setup a time to talk. Sorry I can&#039;t be of more help right away. Seasons Greetings!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ack, I think I just had an aneurysm trying to grasp your situation Bex <img
src='http://cdn.stepforth.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Joking aside, I am afraid I don&#8217;t have the time at the moment to decipher this (due to Christmas deadlines) but I don&#8217;t want you to be left without an option. Please email me <a
href="mailto:ross@stepforth.com">ross@stepforth.com</a> and I will see what I can do in the next few weeks to get back to you. Either that, or, if you wish a faster answer we could assist you with this and any other questions you may have with some consulting time. Just <a
href="http://www.stepforth.com/services/submit-service-request/" rel="nofollow">submit a service request here</a> and we will setup a time to talk. Sorry I can&#8217;t be of more help right away. Seasons Greetings!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mantel</title><link>http://www.stepforth.com/blog/2008/redirects-permanent-301-vs-temporary-302/comment-page-1/#comment-30196</link> <dc:creator>mantel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 07:02:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://dev.stepforth.com/blog/redirects-permanent-301-vs-temporary-302.php#comment-30196</guid> <description>Awesome, can I repost it on my blog?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome, can I repost it on my blog?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bex</title><link>http://www.stepforth.com/blog/2008/redirects-permanent-301-vs-temporary-302/comment-page-1/#comment-29051</link> <dc:creator>Bex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 23:09:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://dev.stepforth.com/blog/redirects-permanent-301-vs-temporary-302.php#comment-29051</guid> <description>This has really helped with my decision. Only last week I read that, when having to move to a new domain/site, to use 302 for about 6 months, then 301 but, that was very much outdated information and this has helped immensely :). However, there is still one thing I&#039;m debating about my situation, I&#039;ll explain and maybe someone could give some insight?I have to move my site from domaina.com to somewhere else. It&#039;s a wordpress blog, I also have domainb.com which is, also a wordpress blog and technically covers the same niche but, not quite as specific as domaina. What I want to do, is move everything from domaina to domainb, whereby domaina.com/post1 redirects with a 301 to domainb.com/post2 and the homepage of domaina, redirects to the specific category on domainb so domaina.com goes to domainb.com/cat/catname - again a 301. What im now wondering however is, thats rather ugly for people still wanting to just see domaina&#039;s content. Could I, or should I use a 302 redirect and give out a shorter url, eg domainb.com/1 redirects to domainb.com/cat/catname ? The alternative is, to set up a new site/domain name so that I can keep the content somewhat specific/more nichey</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has really helped with my decision. Only last week I read that, when having to move to a new domain/site, to use 302 for about 6 months, then 301 but, that was very much outdated information and this has helped immensely <img
src='http://cdn.stepforth.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> . However, there is still one thing I&#8217;m debating about my situation, I&#8217;ll explain and maybe someone could give some insight?</p><p>I have to move my site from domaina.com to somewhere else. It&#8217;s a wordpress blog, I also have domainb.com which is, also a wordpress blog and technically covers the same niche but, not quite as specific as domaina. What I want to do, is move everything from domaina to domainb, whereby domaina.com/post1 redirects with a 301 to domainb.com/post2 and the homepage of domaina, redirects to the specific category on domainb so domaina.com goes to domainb.com/cat/catname &#8211; again a 301. What im now wondering however is, thats rather ugly for people still wanting to just see domaina&#8217;s content. Could I, or should I use a 302 redirect and give out a shorter url, eg domainb.com/1 redirects to domainb.com/cat/catname ? The alternative is, to set up a new site/domain name so that I can keep the content somewhat specific/more nichey</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: manfred</title><link>http://www.stepforth.com/blog/2008/redirects-permanent-301-vs-temporary-302/comment-page-1/#comment-28490</link> <dc:creator>manfred</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:14:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://dev.stepforth.com/blog/redirects-permanent-301-vs-temporary-302.php#comment-28490</guid> <description>great information. thanks!!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great information. thanks!!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Permanent Redirect in ASP.NET 4.0</title><link>http://www.stepforth.com/blog/2008/redirects-permanent-301-vs-temporary-302/comment-page-1/#comment-4461</link> <dc:creator>Permanent Redirect in ASP.NET 4.0</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 19:51:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://dev.stepforth.com/blog/redirects-permanent-301-vs-temporary-302.php#comment-4461</guid> <description>[...] If you are new to Temporary and Permanent Redirect, read Redirects: Permanent 301 vs. Temporary 302 [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you are new to Temporary and Permanent Redirect, read Redirects: Permanent 301 vs. Temporary 302 [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Using A 302 Redirect To Replace 404 Errors Can Kill Your SEO &#124; DevWebPro</title><link>http://www.stepforth.com/blog/2008/redirects-permanent-301-vs-temporary-302/comment-page-1/#comment-4319</link> <dc:creator>Using A 302 Redirect To Replace 404 Errors Can Kill Your SEO &#124; DevWebPro</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:33:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://dev.stepforth.com/blog/redirects-permanent-301-vs-temporary-302.php#comment-4319</guid> <description>[...] your site is currently treating unavailable pages (404 errors) like temporary redirects (302 redirects) you may not have any problems with the search engines but your site is losing out on some [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] your site is currently treating unavailable pages (404 errors) like temporary redirects (302 redirects) you may not have any problems with the search engines but your site is losing out on some [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: freelance-kid.com &#187; Using a 302 Redirect in Place of a 404 Error is a Bad Idea</title><link>http://www.stepforth.com/blog/2008/redirects-permanent-301-vs-temporary-302/comment-page-1/#comment-4055</link> <dc:creator>freelance-kid.com &#187; Using a 302 Redirect in Place of a 404 Error is a Bad Idea</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 05:00:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://dev.stepforth.com/blog/redirects-permanent-301-vs-temporary-302.php#comment-4055</guid> <description>[...] your site is currently treating unavailable pages (404 errors) like temporary redirects (302 redirects) you may not have any problems with the search engines but your site is losing out on some [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] your site is currently treating unavailable pages (404 errors) like temporary redirects (302 redirects) you may not have any problems with the search engines but your site is losing out on some [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Using a 302 Redirect in Place of a 404 Error is a Bad Idea - @_cheap_domains</title><link>http://www.stepforth.com/blog/2008/redirects-permanent-301-vs-temporary-302/comment-page-1/#comment-4006</link> <dc:creator>Using a 302 Redirect in Place of a 404 Error is a Bad Idea - @_cheap_domains</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:48:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://dev.stepforth.com/blog/redirects-permanent-301-vs-temporary-302.php#comment-4006</guid> <description>[...] your site is currently treating unavailable pages (404 errors) like temporary redirects (302 redirects) you may not have any problems with the search engines but your site is losing out on some [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] your site is currently treating unavailable pages (404 errors) like temporary redirects (302 redirects) you may not have any problems with the search engines but your site is losing out on some [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SiteProNews: Webmaster News &#38; Resources &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Using a 302 Redirect in Place of a 404 Error is a Bad Idea</title><link>http://www.stepforth.com/blog/2008/redirects-permanent-301-vs-temporary-302/comment-page-1/#comment-3980</link> <dc:creator>SiteProNews: Webmaster News &#38; Resources &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Using a 302 Redirect in Place of a 404 Error is a Bad Idea</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:10:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://dev.stepforth.com/blog/redirects-permanent-301-vs-temporary-302.php#comment-3980</guid> <description>[...] your site is currently treating unavailable pages (404 errors) like temporary redirects (302 redirects) you may not have any problems with the search engines but your site is losing out on some [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] your site is currently treating unavailable pages (404 errors) like temporary redirects (302 redirects) you may not have any problems with the search engines but your site is losing out on some [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 1/13 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 499/500 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.stepforth.com

Served from: www.stepforth.com @ 2012-02-11 19:02:00 -->
