Comments on: Webster Dictionary Officializes "Google" http://www.stepforth.com/blog/2006/webster-dictionary-officializes-google/ Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:06:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Peter Brookhttp://www.stepforth.com/blog/2006/webster-dictionary-officializes-google/comment-page-1/#comment-1806 Peter Brook Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:18:00 +0000 http://dev.stepforth.com/blog/webster-dictionary-officializes-google.php#comment-1806 I wander if Webster has also added Organic spam in its Dictionary , better if it refer <a HREF="http://www.organicspam.com/blog" REL="nofollow"/> with google referring through Irrelevancy, Organicspam as related word, (not an exaggeration..i thought!) I wander if Webster has also added Organic spam in its Dictionary , better if it refer with google referring through Irrelevancy, Organicspam as related word, (not an exaggeration..i thought!)

]]> By: searchenginefeedshttp://www.stepforth.com/blog/2006/webster-dictionary-officializes-google/comment-page-1/#comment-1805 searchenginefeeds Tue, 11 Jul 2006 16:31:00 +0000 http://dev.stepforth.com/blog/webster-dictionary-officializes-google.php#comment-1805 It's kinda funny, Websters also uses 'Ads by Google' on their definition pages.<br/><br/>They even use them on the Encyclopedia Britanica site.<br/><br/>Wonder how much those ads generate? It’s kinda funny, Websters also uses ‘Ads by Google’ on their definition pages.

They even use them on the Encyclopedia Britanica site.

Wonder how much those ads generate?

]]>