It’s fascinating to believe that an organization that is promoting itself as one of the torch bearers for SEO certification cannot manage to achieve W3C HTML compliancy (69 warnings on the index page).

I encourage you all and wish you the very best of success, but I doubt that you will gain much respect within the community if you fail to lead by example.

A good place to start might be to dump the IIS server space and opt for Nix. Apache has a lot more to offer when rewriting canonical URLs and such.

Good luck,
Ron P.

SeoPros.org index web page has 53 warnings and lacks a DOCTYPE. This is NOT a valid web page. It too, is less than web standards-professional. It exhibits 1920′s table-based coding, not exactly the best for web page optimization.

Less than 1% of 10 billion indexed web pages across the W.W.W. are valid, follow web standards. SIP and SeoPro web pages fit right in with the 99.9%. Not exactly the elite of the elite. They appear to be more of a marketing-revenue machine!?!

The W.2 web standard appears to be ruby on shakey rails, “what’s cool”, “what socially networks”, “the power of the voice-mass”, link, blog, rss, and inter-relate your hearts out, not professionalism. The W.2 appears to lacks respect for the W.W.W. platform and the folks who worked hard to freely provided it to us. Considering, SIP and seopro should do quite well.

Hopefully, they will tidy up a bit, hey?
The best of luck to both.

Kind Regards,
Vladimir A. Toman