<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Is a Shake Out Shaping the Search Marketing Sector? (Part 1)</title> <atom:link href="http://www.stepforth.com/blog/2005/is-a-shake-out-shaping-the-search-marketing-sector-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.stepforth.com/blog/2005/is-a-shake-out-shaping-the-search-marketing-sector-part-1/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 23:13:12 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Brokerblogger</title><link>http://www.stepforth.com/blog/2005/is-a-shake-out-shaping-the-search-marketing-sector-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1705</link> <dc:creator>Brokerblogger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 17:59:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://dev.stepforth.com/blog/is-a-shake-out-shaping-the-search-marketing-sector-part-1.php#comment-1705</guid> <description>Jim,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I like this post, as I do most of your posts since they are &quot;fair and balanced&quot;.  But, I liked the &quot;extended version&quot; of this topic on ISEdb.com better.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I was away since about the middle of December, and just now (1/3/05) did a post on my Brokerblogger blog (with a link to the ISEdb article) that is leading to one possible help for the Search Marketing Industry in dealing with its credibility &amp; educational issues.  I believe that if done properly by both buyer and seller, it could help SEO&#039;s make more money and reduce turnover.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I know how busy you must be, but I&#039;d consider it an honor to get your opinion of my preliminary posts (7 in this series, so far) that are leading to my eventual specific suggestion.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Anyway, Happy New Year.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Bill Kelm</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,</p><p>I like this post, as I do most of your posts since they are &#8220;fair and balanced&#8221;.  But, I liked the &#8220;extended version&#8221; of this topic on ISEdb.com better.</p><p>I was away since about the middle of December, and just now (1/3/05) did a post on my Brokerblogger blog (with a link to the ISEdb article) that is leading to one possible help for the Search Marketing Industry in dealing with its credibility &#038; educational issues.  I believe that if done properly by both buyer and seller, it could help SEO&#8217;s make more money and reduce turnover.</p><p>I know how busy you must be, but I&#8217;d consider it an honor to get your opinion of my preliminary posts (7 in this series, so far) that are leading to my eventual specific suggestion.</p><p>Anyway, Happy New Year.</p><p>Bill Kelm</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 4/11 queries in 0.019 seconds using disk

Served from: www.stepforth.com @ 2010-07-30 20:30:10 -->